Costco Wholesale Corp. is punching back at Tiffany & Co., after the luxe jeweler sued the warehouse club for selling unauthorized Tiffany-branded engagement rings in its stores.
The big box retailer denied ever selling Tiffany-branded baubles, instead claiming that it only used the words “Tiffany setting” to describe the ring setting.
In counterclaims, which were filed in Manhattan federal court on Friday, Costco said “the word Tiffany is a generic term for ring settings comprising multiple slender prongs extending upward from a base to hold a single gemstone.”
Citing multiple examples of dictionary entries, references and advertising using the word “Tiffany” to denote a type or style of ring setting, Costco said it has “sold unbranded rings having Tiffany settings for many years.”
The jeweler became aware of the situation last November, and a month later sent out a cease-and-desist letter. Costco immediately took down the signage, but according to Tiffany intangible damage had been sustained. The New York-based retailer is looking for a permanent injunction and damages, which will be decided by the court.
In its counterclaims, Costco argued that Tiffany “falsely accused” it of using “counterfeit trademarks and selling counterfeit Tiffany rings.” The rings, which were unbranded, included Tiffany settings and were “accurately described as such on in-store signs,” Costco’s lawyers said.
“Diamond rings purchased at Costco come in plain beige outer gift boxes unlike rings sold by Tiffany & Co., which come in blue outer gift boxes bearing the name Tiffany & Co.,” attorneys noted, adding that rings purchased at Costco are unbranded and come with receipts that clearly indicate their origin of purchase — Costco.
In a bold move, Costco not only denied having infringed on Tiffany’s trademarks, but it also asked the court to permanently ban Tiffany from claiming it controls the name of the ring setting, which Costco deems as “generic.” As a result, Costco said it wants court-ordered changes to the federal trademark registration, which Tiffany is putting forward as evidence.
The wholesaler also wants Tiffany to “admit” that its well-publicized lawsuit against Omega SA was “dismissed on grounds of copyright misuse.” In its complaint, Tiffany had cited the lawsuit, implying that the cases had similarities, Costco said.
Finally, Costco is looking for the court to drop Tiffany’s lawsuit and award it any equitable relief it deems proper.
“I’ve struggled my whole life to find a bathing suit that fits me that doesn’t look like a maternity bra. I’m proud of the line because it’s an accurate representation of me rather than me putting on someone else’s clothes,” says @atlantabean of her swimwear collaboration with @piaarrobio, LPA X ATL. The two decided on a swimwear collab and increased the industry standard size for the pieces. Read more about the line — and our interview with de Cadenet Taylor and Arrobio — on WWD.com #wwdfashion
Exclusive: Cate Blanchett has been named the first global beauty ambassador for @armanibeauty. Blanchett has been the face of the brand’s Sì fragrance franchise since 2013, and is now representing all of the label’s beauty categories including makeup and skin care. #wwdbeauty (📷: @zefashioninsider)
“From concept to creation, my goal was to create beautiful pieces, with a variety of sizes, all at affordable prices,” said @joansmalls of the swimwear and intimate apparel she designed for @smartandsexysocial. The collection includes neon laced bras, sheer bodysuits and swimwear separates. The intimates collection will launch in July, while the swimwear collection will be available for purchase on Tuesday at select @walmart stores, walmart.com and smartandsexy.com. #wwdfashion