Democrats in Congress considered moves Tuesday that would counteract Supreme Court decisions involving minimum pricing agreements and pay discrimination that have broad implications for the fashion industry.
WASHINGTON — Democrats in Congress considered moves Tuesday that would counteract Supreme Court decisions involving minimum pricing agreements and pay discrimination that have broad implications for the fashion industry.
A Senate panel listened to testimony at a hearing on the fairness of the High Court's decision overturning an almost-century-old law setting minimum pricing agreements between retailers and manufacturers.
In the House, lawmakers passed a measure that would override a decision that placed time limits on employees filing pay discrimination lawsuits.
The Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights reviewed the ruling on Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. PSKS Inc. The decision gives lower courts the flexibility to determine, on a case-by-case basis, whether minimum pricing agreements are anticompetitive based on several factors. It supplanted a law that held minimum pricing agreements between retailers and manufacturers were illegal.
While the fallout in the industry is still being assessed, many opponents of the court's ruling argue that off-price retailers and discounters could be adversely affected and consumers will be forced to pay higher prices.
In the majority opinion, the Supreme Court justices, while acknowledging that minimum pricing agreements could be abused by powerful manufacturers or retailers, argued that they could also spur competition.
Subcommittee chairman Herb Kohl (D., Wis.), whose family founded Kohl's department store in 1962, said: "I am particularly worried about the effect of this new rule permitting minimum vertical price-fixing on the next generation of discount retailers, the next Sam Walton. If new discount retailers can be prevented from selling products at a discount at the behest of an established retailer worried about competition, we may imperil an essential element of retail competition so beneficial to consumers."
Marcy Syms, chief executive officer of Syms Corp., an off-price retailer with 33 stores in 13 states, testified at the Senate panel hearing about the "undesirable effects" retail price maintenance [RPM] agreements will have on her business and on off-price and discounting business as a whole.
"The prohibition on RPM agreements has, I believe, kept in check serious threats to Syms' ability to sell merchandise," she said. "That may well change as manufacturer-oriented RPM policies become more prevalent in the clothing industry."
“I see things on the hanger and I’m, like, ‘I never knew that color worked on me.’ It’s things you necessarily wouldn’t choose to wear, but once you put them on, you see why Janie is who Janie is." — Lily Collins on working with former "Mad Men" costume designer, Janie Bryant on creating looks for her role as Celia Brady's in Amazon series, "The Last Tycoon." 📸@jilliansollazzo #wwdeye
EXCLUSIVE: Sarah Rutson has been tapped to Build New American Fashion Group. The parent of Joie, Equipment and Current/Elliott hired the merchant to rev up its brands and expand its portfolio into designer, beauty and lifestyle categories. Read more on WWD.com, link in bio. #wwdfashion
Michael Kors' $1.3B Jimmy Choo deal has the company squaring off with Coach Inc. as both seek to build American powerhouses. Coach bought Stuart Weitzman in 2015 and Kate Spade just two weeks ago, but Michael Kors' acquisition may be putting pressure on its rival in the new push for scale. #wwdnews (📷: George Chinsee)
Meet actress Lucy Boynton, who plays opposite Naomi Watts in the recently released Netflix series "Gypsy." Boynton stopped by WWD to talk about her upcoming projects and her nomadic lifestyle. Get all the details on WWD.com. #wwdeye (📷: @dandoperalski)