By  on October 19, 2009

Excess is out and prudence is in.

A year after the financial markets melted down and the days of freewheeling spending on luxury goods came to a grinding halt, top-tier jewelers have adapted to marketing their best pieces in this economy. In an era when conspicuous consumption appears on the wane, pitching diamond and gemstone jewelry that can sell for upward of $100,000 and go into the millions is definitely a challenge. Consumers’ new mind-set makes it even tougher, executives and retailers say, even as they stress consumers are getting more comfortable with spending again.

So fine jewelers are adopting two tactics. One is to market the pieces as an investment that can help diversify the customer’s financial portfolio. The other strategy plays on the limited nature of truly rare pieces: buy now or it may never be available again.

David Klein, executive director at Leviev, said clients come into the firm’s Madison Avenue boutique looking for value. “We have people that come in and say, ‘I want something special, something that’s going to keep the value,’” he said, noting that Leviev, which is known for its white and yellow diamonds, had several important sales in the past several months and that clients come in asking which pieces would be solid investments. “People are interested in seeing [what we have]. They want large, whites and yellows.”

One client is said to have come in with his wife a few months ago wanting to invest in diamonds and she got to choose the piece. Initially they spent $2 million, but after a few months of evaluating the purchase, he upped the ante with the purchase of a pair of $4 million diamond earrings.

Leviev is aggressively procuring new pieces made with ultrarare and pricy stones. Standout pieces include a collar of oval- and round-cut white diamonds interspersed with intense pink diamonds, and a 76-carat pink diamond that has been reset as a pendant surrounded by smaller colored diamonds in orange, green, yellow, pink and blue that retails for $18 million.

“We haven’t changed because times have changed and it’s serving us well,” added Klein.

Graff America president and chief executive officer Henri Barguirdjian said the London-based firm would never dream of selling its rarefied jewels from an investment aspect, saying, “It’s never a consideration.” But with diamonds and gems escalating in price year upon year, the investment aspect is not to be discounted.

Barguirdjian claims Graff’s business in America is good, although the nature of sales is different.

“My business has changed completely,” he said. “Most of the bread-and-butter [opening price point] business has disappeared, and we are selling only important pieces.”

The average price point at Graff is $200,000.

“It’s logical to a certain extent,” said Barguirdjian. “Clients realize that fine diamonds and fine colored stones keep their value.…When you think about it, each piece of jewelry [costs] more than a house.”

Barguirdjian noted a client to whom Graff sold a 5-carat fancy pink diamond four years ago doubled his investment when selling the stone through Christie’s in Hong Kong in December.

“They are buying, and in the back of their mind is an investment,” he added.

While diamonds are universally graded by carat, clarity, cut and color, their prices aren’t monitored like gold is on the commodities index. The international industry standard for a wholesale price gauge for diamonds is through a company called Rapaport. The “Rap Sheet” periodically lists diamond prices, offering a barometer for industry members. The October 2009 Rap Sheet printed wholesale prices of $23,100 for a 1- to 1.49-carat D-color, flawless stone and $121,500 for an E-color 10- to 10.99-carat round diamond, VVS1, meaning it has an inclusion invisible to the naked eye.

Even as fine jewelers target consumers with products that are either an investment or a not-to-be-missed one-off, there is no doubt the sector, like all luxury goods, continues to see tough times. In March, Bulgari SpA cut jobs, reducing the number of products and closing unprofitable stores after the company’s earnings fell 45.1 percent in 2008. In July, the Roman jewelry firm reported a net loss of $53.8 million in the first half ending June 30, citing a slowdown in demand for fine watches and jewelry in the U.S. Chopard, a privately held firm, cut staff and expenses in the spring and summer.

In August, Tiffany & Co. beat earnings estimates by cutting costs and expenses, but profits fell by 29.7 percent. In September, Harry Winston Diamond Corp., which supplies rough diamonds to the global market from its 40 percent ownership interest in Diavik Diamond Mine, reported an operating loss of $5.6 million for the three months ended July 31, versus an operating profit of $5.9 million a year earlier amid significant layoffs. In the U.S. alone, revenue decreased 48 percent to $15 million.

However, Winston, which controls the Harry Winston retail network, said it would resume production for winter at Diavik Diamond mine in Canada’s Northwest Territories, after planning to shut down for the season. Summer production was halted, affecting some 600 employees, in response to market conditions.

Diamond mining giant De Beers SA also cut production by 73 percent compared with the same period last year, to 6.6 million carats, and reduced the global workforce by 23 percent. In July, the company reported a 99 percent decline in first-half net profit citing “historically difficult trading conditions,” and, in the six months to June 30, net profit fell to $3 million from $316 million in the same period last year, while total sales fell 54.2 percent to $1.71 billion from $3.74 billion during the same period last year.

But Gareth Penny, managing director of De Beers Group, said American buyers are for the first time viewing diamonds as assets across the board.

“People want to invest in diamonds,” said Penny. “A year ago, no one asked if they were a good store of value.…People are conscious of lasting value.”

Industry consultant Robert Burke of Robert Burke & Associates, agreed. “Pitching [high-end jewelry] as an investment is going to make more sense in this economy and state of mind,” he said. “Passion purchasing or anything that is emotionally motivated or whimsical doesn’t feel correct right now.”

De Beers has launched a major marketing campaign called Everlon. The diamond-mining giant has partnered with several Sightholders and designers across many price levels to play on the motif of a round diamond being hugged by a rope of pavé diamonds inspired by the Hercules knot, an ancient symbol of strength. According to Penny, the styles symbolize hope, support and faith of a loved one in these uncertain times. Prices start as low as $249.59 for a pendant with diamonds totaling 0.2 carats at J.C. Penney to the high thousands for a one-of-a-kind pair of large diamond pendant earrings designed by venerable jewelry designer Martin Katz.

For Stephen Russell, the Madison Avenue jeweler specializing in top-quality, signed vintage pieces as well as new designs, the main selling is buy now, because pieces are one of a kind and won’t necessarily come back on the market in the near future.

Zelenetz told the story of a client who hemmed and hawed over buying a piece a year ago and ultimately didn’t. That same client came into the boutique recently and said he regretted he didn’t buy the piece, as the money he was bound to spend on it foundered in the stock market.

To access this article, click here to subscribe or to log in.

To Read the Full Article

Tap into our Global Network

Of Industry Leaders and Designers

load comments
blog comments powered by Disqus