WASHINGTON — Supreme Court justices wrestled with a case Tuesday pitting chic lingerie chain Victoria’s Secret against a Kentucky lingerie and sex-toy shop called Victor’s Secret, in a test that could change the scope of trademark protections.

Attorneys for Victoria’s Secret, the global intimate-apparel chain, argued that Victor’s Secret, a shop in a retail strip mall, illegally confuses consumers familiar with Victoria’s Secret. As a result, Victoria’s Secret maintains its name has been illegally used in violation of federal protections granted well-known brands under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act.

To Read the Full Article
SUBSCRIBE NOW

Tap into our Global Network

Of Industry Leaders and Designers

load comments
blog comments powered by Disqus