Corporations, public relations firms and media companies will be keeping a close eye on the outcome of the pending Supreme Court case between Nike Inc. and a California consumer, which stands to redefine what constitutes false advertising.

Their concern is whether the Supreme Court will let stand a California case saying Nike’s defense in 1997 against antisweatshop allegations wasn’t protected by the Constitution’s First Amendment free-speech protections. The court in April will hear the case arising from San Francisco activist Marc Kasky, claiming that Nike lied about conditions in its Asian contractors when mounting a public relations campaign assuring consumers that the factory conditions and treatment of its workers met high standards.

To Read the Full Article

Tap into our Global Network

Of Industry Leaders and Designers

load comments
blog comments powered by Disqus