The Bush administration's decision to bring an illegal subsidies case against China in the World Trade Organization comes against the backdrop of a record trade deficit and increased pressure from Democrats in Congress pushing for a harder line...
WASHINGTON — The Bush administration's decision to bring an illegal subsidies case against China in the World Trade Organization comes against the backdrop of a record trade deficit and increased pressure from Democrats in Congress pushing for a harder line against that country.
The case, which is the first step in a long process that could lead to removing the subsidies or higher tariffs on Chinese-made goods, might influence the debate among lawmakers who will decide whether to extend President Bush's authority to negotiate trade deals without congressional amendments.
"The export subsidies give an unfair competitive advantage to Chinese products when they are exported," said U.S. Trade Representative Susan Schwab at a news conference Friday. "That means a range of domestically produced goods in the United States, from steel to wood products to infotech, are denied an opportunity to compete fairly in the United States and in third-country markets where they are up against subsidized imports from China."
During the first 11 months of 2006, the trade deficit with China reached a record $213.5 billion.
Schwab said the U.S. did not know the full impact of the subsidies, which come in several forms, including income tax reductions, discounted lending rates and exemptions from contributing to worker benefits, all for companies that reach certain export thresholds. Apparel and textile manufacturers are among the producers who might be supported.
China agreed to eliminate WTO-prohibited subsidies when it joined the global trading body in 2001, but has taken no action to do so, Schwab said.
This marks the third time the U.S. has brought a case against China to the WTO. The first, involving semiconductors, was settled. A case on auto parts is pending. Such complaints may take years to reach a resolution, either by negotiated settlement, WTO arbitration or, if that fails, a WTO ruling on removing the subsidies or imposing higher tariffs on Chinese goods.
The move was long overdue, said Auggie Tantillo, executive director of the American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition. "This case now gives other countries an easy vehicle to attach themselves to," he said. "Hopefully, this case snowballs through numerous other players and brings this issue of Chinese state-sponsored subsidies to a head."
"I think that all anyone really wants in life is to have people understand us for who we actually are, despite everything," says Ruth Negga. The actress talks "Preachers" season 2 and more on WWD.com. #wwdeye (📷: Dan Doperalski)
"That's something that resonates with me too because I'm so locked into a number. If I go over that number it completely ruins my day so it's nice to get detached from the number on the scale." - Chelsea Handler on Kelly LeVeque's book "Body Love." #wwdeye (📷: John Salangsang)