View Slideshow

Coming off of a solid win in the Florida primary on Tuesday, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, along with the three remaining GOP candidates, headed to Nevada for the caucus there on Saturday. Their positions on a wide range of issues, from taxing the rich and lowering income taxes to trade with Latin America, figured prominently in the campaign talk. Here’s what they’ve been saying.

ON LATIN AMERICA:


Texas Rep. Ron Paul:
“I would work with the people and encourage free trade and try to set a standard here where countries in Central America or South America or any place in the world would want to emulate us and set the standards that we have.”

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney:
“We have to have economic initiatives to build trade throughout Latin America, particularly with Colombia and Panama, now part of free trade agreements.”

This story first appeared in the February 2, 2012 issue of WWD. Subscribe Today.

Former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum: “For domestic political purposes, the President of the United States sided with organized labor and the environmental groups, and held Colombia hanging out to dry for three years. We cannot do that to our friends in South America.”

 

ON THE RICH, POOR AND TAXES:

Romney: “I’m not concerned about the very poor. We have a safety net there. If it needs repair, I’ll fix it. I’m not concerned about the very rich. They’re doing just fine. I’m concerned about the very heart of America, the 90 to 95 percent of Americans who right now are struggling.”

See Last Week’s ‘On the Campaign Trail’ Here >>

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich: “My goal is to shrink the government to fit the revenue, not to raise the revenue to catch up with the government.”

Santorum: “I believe in a differential. I don’t believe in a flat tax. I believe in a simplified tax code, with five deductions and…creating two rates. I don’t believe in a zero capital gains tax rate. I don’t think you need to get to zero to make sure that there’s an efficient deployment of capital and investment.”

Paul: “I understand and really empathize with the people who talk about the 99 percent and the 1 percent, because there’s a characteristic about what happens when you destroy a currency. There is a transfer of wealth from the middle class to the wealthy. And this has been going on for 40 years. So the middle class is shrinking. They are getting poorer and they’re losing their jobs and they’re losing their houses. But Wall Street isn’t getting poorer, and they are the ones who are getting the bailout.”

SAY WHAT?

Gingrich: “I want to see us move from one launch [to the moon] occasionally to six or seven launches a day. [When 13,000 Americans are] living on the moon, they can petition to become a state.”

Paul: “If you don’t have sound money and if you have a welfare state, no matter whether the welfare state is designed to help the poor, you know, the welfare system helps the wealthy.”

ON THE SIDELINES:


President Obama
: “When it comes to paying our fair share, I believe we should follow the Buffett Rule: If you make more than $1 million a year…then you should pay a tax rate of at least 30 percent. On the other hand, if you decide to go into a less lucrative profession, if you decide to become a teacher, and we need teachers, if you decide to go into public service, if you decide to go into a helping profession, if you make less than $250,000 a year, which 98 percent of Americans do, then your taxes shouldn’t go up. This is part of the idea of shared responsibility. I know a lot of folks have been running around calling this class warfare. I think asking a billionaire to pay at least as much as his secretary in taxes is just common sense.

“We’ve got to invest in our future, and we’ve got to reduce our deficit. And to do both, we’ve got to make some choices.…Right now, we’re scheduled to spend nearly $1 trillion more on what was intended to be a temporary tax cut for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans. That’s not fair. A quarter of all millionaires pay lower tax rates than millions of middle-class households.

“And to bring back even more jobs, I want this Congress to stop rewarding companies that are shipping jobs and profits overseas, start rewarding companies who are hiring here and investing here and creating good jobs here in Michigan and here in the United States of America. So our first step is rebuilding American manufacturing. And by the way, not all the jobs that have gone overseas are going to come back. We have to be realistic. And technology means that a larger portion of you will work in the service sector, as engineers and computer scientists. The service sector does well if manufacturing is doing well, so we’ve got to make sure that America isn’t just buying stuff but we’re also selling stuff, all around the world, products stamped with those three proud words: Made In America.”

And here are some suggestions on their style:

 

Rick Santorum

If On the Trail means eating fast food on the bus between campaign stops and wearing oversize clothes to hide a couple of extra pounds, Santorum was the winner this week. He should have opted for darker-colored khakis and a blazer and given up the ultrapreppie uniform — but nice belt. And please, they’re casual pants — lose the crease.

Mitt Romney

The Florida caucus winner cannot seem to let go of the mom jeans and the loafers make it worse. He needs to man it up. The saving grace is the high-neck button-down shirt that helps frame his traditionally handsome face. The soft tailored navy blazer enhances his European fashion aesthetic, very Palm Beach, but it doesn’t hide his newly aggressive stance.

Ron Paul

Grandpa finally put on a suit! But he might want to call his tailor and ask for a more structured silhouette with a stronger shoulder. The choice of red tie is very appropriate for a man seeking to look more powerful and presidential. But he’s still wearing orthopedic shoes and he needs a little peekaboo cuff to appear put-together.

Newt Gingrich

A disappointed Newt continues to battle with very dry, flyaway hair. A visit to the barber will solve that and would make him look less like Colonel Sanders from Kentucky Fried Chicken. The off-white shirt and tan tie combination is chic but not appropriate for a political appearance. And it does nothing for his face. Sharp contrast colors pop and help reassure voters of the candidate’s strength.

load comments
blog comments powered by Disqus