A new report by the Worker Rights Consortium alleges union-seeking workers in one of Shahi Exports’ factories in Bangalore were threatened and beaten by managers.
With 50 factories in India and approximately 70,000 employees, Shahi is a leading supplier to brands and retailers. Known as Shahi Unit 8, the Bangalore factory in question makes goods for H&M, Benetton, Columbia Sportswear Co. and Abercrombie & Fitch, according to the WRC. As a result of the April 4 incident, 15 employees’ activists were terminated and 10 were assaulted — with one suffering a spinal injury and another being “nearly strangled,” according to WRC executive director Scott Nova. Those claims were corroborated by the testimony of multiple witnesses and by the victim herself, he said.
“Under pressure, Shahi has offered to reinstate the employees with back pay, but is refusing to fire the people who assaulted them and issued death threats. For obvious reasons, the workers are very reluctant to return to a factory where the people in charge are the people who beat them and threatened to kill them,” Nova said.
After identifying eight managers and supervisors, and one nonsupervisory employee that the group holds responsible for the incident, the WRC has asked Shahi executives to fire these individuals. Thus far, their only proposal is to transfer three of those people temporarily, pending the outcome of their own investigation. “Which is to say, Shahi’s investigation of Shahi. For obvious reasons, that is not a credible inquiry. As of now, they are not taking any action. It’s been 10 weeks. Nobody’s been fired,” Nova said.
In a statement issued by a spokeswoman Thursday, Columbia said it “takes seriously any allegations of violations of fair labor standards and continuously monitors all of our sites to ensure safe and fair working conditions. It has come to our attention that there are allegations of violations of fair labor practices at the Shahi factory, in Bangalore, India. We have insisted that Shahi management take immediate action to address the situation, including: reinstate suspended workers, pay medical expenses of workers, return any personal property of workers, engage in constructive and meaningful engagement with the union, and discipline any employees that are found to have engaged in violence or acts of discrimination. We have also insisted that Shahi formally and publicly reconfirm their commitment to freedom of association and to maintaining a safe and nondiscriminatory workplace. We understand that the people who have been accused of violence have been suspended pending investigation. We have required Shahi to undertake these actions immediately and we will monitor progress with weekly meetings. If meaningful and prompt progress is not made toward meeting these requirements, we will take necessary steps, including reducing or ceasing production in the factory.”
But Nova presented a different story. “The brands have supported the idea of reinstatement, but have been unwilling to require Shahi to terminate the managers who committed the violence. We’ve also asked the brands to recognize the union and bargain with the union, which was what the workers were seeking and was the reason Shahi attacked them in the first place.”
An H&M spokeswoman said, “We are deeply concerned by the alleged abuse against workers at one of our suppliers. We have an ongoing dialogue with the legal worker representatives, which are supported by IndustriALL Global Union, as well as the supplier. We believe it is important that the legal parties resolve this dispute and we have since April handled this with priority and been facilitating the dialogue between them to find a solution.
Three years ago the H&M Group signed a Global Framework Agreement, GFA, with the global trade union IndustriALL and the Swedish Trade Union IF Metall. “Apart from acting as a framework for local capacity building, this has also proved to be a good platform to engage around dispute resolutions,” she said.
The H&M statement read, “Our position is that the right to join or form a trade union and bargain collectively is a fundamental right of workers. The core to our social sustainability strategy is to support a well-functioning dialogue between workers’ representatives and employers, to strengthen the voice of the workers and to enable these rights. We also believe that the safety and the well-being of the workers should be a priority at all times. Workers’ representatives shall not be discriminated against and shall have access to carry out their representative functions in the workplace. Even in the absence of a trade union in factories, workers should have means of speaking their voice to raise employment-related issues without the risk of retaliation.”
An Abercrombie & Fitch spokeswoman initially offered the company’s sustainability policy as a response, declining to comment further or to specify if it will continue to work with that factory. The following statement was issued by the company June 27, “We are deeply disturbed for what occurred at Shahi’s Unit 8 factory and at the pain and suffering caused to the 15 workers. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. works to ensure that our products are made in safe and responsible facilities and require all factories with whom we work to follow the standards set forth in our Vendor Code of Conduct. We do not tolerate this type of behavior and since our receipt of the initial report, our team has been working diligently with our agent to ensure corrective action is taken by the vendor in this factory.”
The statement continued, “We agree with WRC that the burden is on Shahi to fully live up to the corrective action and we have and made it clear to our agent the urgency of immediately addressing the issues. In discussions with our agent, Shahi has confirmed that the requests from WRC will be actioned on. If the corrective steps are not taken, however, including terminating the workers involved, our relationship with Shahi will be terminated. We are committed to ensuring the safety and welfare of the factories’ personnel. A&F Co. will be monitoring on a first-hand basis the situation at Unit 8 and will continue to work closely with our agents as they seek to ensure these types of unacceptable issues do not recur within Shahi’s organization.”
A Benetton spokesperson said, “The Benetton Group takes seriously the matters raised in WRC investigation. As per our code of conduct, to which all our suppliers must adhere, we unequivocally sustain workers’ rights, including their right to assemble. Benetton regularly monitors its supply chain, applies rigorous risk assessment and carries out regular, unannounced, audits – in line with the best practices in the industry. We will continue to carry out our own investigation into the allegations as well as increase monitoring frequency of the supplier in question to ensure respect of our code of conduct. We will take appropriate actions if necessary.”
“Benetton is in continuous contact with Shahi and we insist Shahi guarantee workers’ rights including, but not limited to, health and safety in the workplace and freedom of association.
Finally, the authority is carrying out its own investigation into the alleged events. Only when the investigation is completed will we be able to draw any conclusions and determine what actions – if any – are necessary and appropriate. Until that time, Benetton will continue in its efforts to remain constantly engaged in the development of this situation.” the Benetton spokesperson said.
Claiming that Shahi “has succeeded in terrorizing the workforce” at the aforementioned facility, Nova said the union now can’t get eight people to attend a meeting where they had “hundreds in the past.” From his perspective, “the only way to right the wrong and enable workers to exercise their rights going forward is to get rid of the managers that attacked them and force the brand to actually deal with the union as a representative of workers. If those two things don’t happen, Shahi will have succeeded in destroying workers’ efforts to exercise their rights. There will be no union at Shahi Unit 8,” Nova said. “The brands understand that, but they’re refusing to take the necessary action. Effectively, it makes a mockery of their own codes of conduct.”
Nova also challenged how effectively the brands enforce their own labor standards, considering Shahi has been a major supplier for the leading apparel and retail brands in the world. The WRC plans to keep pressuring brands with the hopes that if the brands move, Shahi will also move.
Nova added, “What should have happened in a case like this, if the brands were serious about their codes, they should have told Shahi the moment they found out about this, ‘We will not place a single additional order at any of your factories until the people who did this are fired, the workers are back at work and the union is recognized. If they had taken this position, this would have been addressed two months ago.”